Viewing entries in
Communication

TOP 3 TIPS FOR DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS

Comment

TOP 3 TIPS FOR DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS

Years ago, I mediated a conflict between two partners in a law firm. Peter was ten years senior to Jim. They had worked together as partners for five years and over that period, it had become extremely difficult for them to have a civil conversation about anything.  Once they looked back at their history working together, they identified a root of their conflict. 

The root was anchored in Peter’s exertion of seniority to block Jim’s desire to fire his assistant immediately. Both had good reasons for wanting what they wanted. The assistant had been gone from the firm for at least three years.  It seemed like a disagreement of three years earlier, over how best to manage a subordinate, was still alive and affecting the ability of Peter and Jim to work together. Over the years, Jim’s resentment grew as did Peter’s certainty in his decision and exercise of power. They avoided talking about their feelings and instead empowered them.

Why is it easier for professionals to give clear direction and bad news in the midst of of a time-sensitive, critical emergency than have an open and honest conversation about feelings? The words for conversations to resolve a conflict or misunderstanding between two lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, and consultants, making sense of an uncomfortable situation or finding the right words to say and knowing what do are blocked by emotions.

While some emotions, like excitement and anger can feel energizing and bring clarity, others, like humiliation, embarrassment, guilt and shame can be paralyzing. The latter feel so uncomfortable that they block, what Daniel Kahneman calls System 2 thinking – deliberate, logical, and analytical thinking. Instead, they nudge into play the easily accessible options - acting too quickly and paralysis in an attempt to escape these feelings. The end point is the same - unintended consequences.  

The triggers for difficult conversations that trigger System 2 thinking often involve the readjustment of roles and responsibilities or the resolution of conflicting values.  Succession planning, compensation, or the business model are often a source of agitation.  Conflict and misunderstanding are often consequences.

If you are facing a difficult conversation arising out of conflict or misunderstanding, keep these three tips in mind.

1.     Acknowledge emotions and thoughts.

It’s a mistake to ignore emotions.  Doing so, empowers emotions to cause blocks and missteps and impairs good decision-making. Instead of ignoring emotions, notice the signs – the knots in your stomach, a headache, a racing heartbeat, or an increase or decrease of sensation within your torso or limbs. Then ask yourself questions about what you are feeling. Name the emotion if you can. If not, google emotions to expand your vocabulary and your ability to name emotions. You may have heard the phrase with regard to emotions, “name them to tame them.” The power of emotions over thought processes and decision-making lessens with acknowledgement. Emotions are easier to spot than the hidden narratives and thoughts, but know that unconscious thinking also affects emotions.

What are you telling yourself about the difficult situation and conversation? Expand your self-awareness and expand your options for managing a difficult conversation effectively.

Why do you expect an upcoming difficult conversation to be difficult? What are you expecting to happen during the conversation? What emotions do you expect others to experience? What do you imagine they expect? 

After acknowledging your emotions and thoughts, consider the overall message and specific information you really want to convey and how best to do it, so that it will be heard and processed as you intend. Focus on your main message and a good outcome for the conversation so that collaboration for a solution becomes possible. Be clear about what you want, don’t want, need, expect, or prefer. Know your mind and then you’ll be better able to help others, who can’t read your mind, understand where you need help.  

Noticing isn’t just personal.  It’s about noticing the emotions of others and adjusting what you say and how you say it, to keep the conversation flowing productively. Emotions, just like the content of a conversation, provide important information.

2.     Listen.

When your stress level is too high, you may overlook important information and limit the meaning of what you notice and hidden opportunities.  Instead, slow down.  Take a breath. Do nothing other than listen carefully. Listen for content and emotion. What’s being said and how? It’s easy to assume that you understand another person’s position; however, conflict is often not about different positions as much as it is about emotions, interests, needs, and wants that go unnoticed and unacknowledged. The only way to understand another person is to listen to understand. Asking good, open-ended questions will give you content worth your time and effort to listen carefully.

It’s often easier to engage in a targeted listening.  Listening for information that supports or undermines an existing position is easier than listening to understand what matters most to the person communicating an idea or emotion. Instead, if your goal is to resolve a conflict productively, listen without judgment.  Listen to understand. Assume whatever you hear is true for the person saying it instead of trying to correct what you believe is a misunderstanding. 

If you listen to better understand the other person’s interests and concerns, you may find options to resolve a conflict without damaging relationships.  One of my clients put it this way, “R before T.” Relationship before task.  The team and organization falls apart if relationships are not built and solidified at every opportunities. Without relationships, the tasks that can be completed are extremely limited.

3.     Demonstrate that you care.

Even the best listener and the most astute observer and analyst conveys unintended messages by skipping over the opportunity to demonstrate understanding and compassion.   Digest what you hear and observe and share back your summary. Then, ask if you captured everything the other person wanted you to notice and understand. Include emotional tenor and not just content.

Active listening, empathic listening, or reflective listening all suggest the importance of being aware of the inadvertent messages you send by what you do and say during and after the other communicates. During any conversation, especially one with an element of conflict, the opportunity to convey intentional messages to improve relationships exists. If your goal is to strengthen the bonds of a business or personal relationship, take advantage of all such opportunities.

Demonstrate that you care about the other person by asking open-ended questions. Then, acknowledge their feelings, demonstrate concern, and summarize and paraphrase what you hear and then asking if you understood their meaning.

Comment

Top 3 tips for difficult conversations

Comment

Top 3 tips for difficult conversations

By Susan Letterman White

Years ago, I mediated a conflict between two partners in a law firm. Peter was ten years senior to Jim. They had worked together as partners for five years and over that period, it had become extremely difficult for them to have a civil conversation about anything.  Once they looked back at their history working together, they identified a root of their conflict. 

The root was anchored in Peter’s exertion of seniority to block Jim’s desire to fire his assistant immediately. Both had good reasons for wanting what they wanted. The assistant had been gone from the firm for at least three years.  It seemed like a disagreement of three years earlier, over how best to manage a subordinate, was still alive and affecting the ability of Peter and Jim to work together. Over the years, Jim’s resentment grew as did Peter’s certainty in his decision and exercise of power. They avoided talking about their feelings and instead empowered them.

Why is it easier for professionals to give clear direction and bad news in the midst of of a time-sensitive, critical emergency than to have an open and honest conversation about feelings? The words for conversations to resolve a conflict or misunderstanding between two lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, and consultants, making sense of an uncomfortable situation or finding the right words to say and knowing what do are blocked by emotions.

While some emotions, like excitement and anger can feel energizing and bring clarity, others, like humiliation, embarrassment, guilt and shame can be paralyzing. The latter feel so uncomfortable that they block, what Daniel Kahneman calls System 2 thinking – deliberate, logical, and analytical thinking. Instead, they nudge into play the easily accessible options - acting too quickly and paralysis in an attempt to escape these feelings. The end point is the same - unintended consequences.  

The triggers for difficult conversations that trigger System 2 thinking often involve the readjustment of roles and responsibilities or the resolution of conflicting values.  Succession planning, compensation, or the business model are often a source of agitation.  Conflict and misunderstanding are often consequences.

If you are facing a difficult conversation arising out of conflict or misunderstanding, keep these three tips in mind.

1. Acknowledge emotions and thoughts.

It’s a mistake to ignore emotions.  Doing so, empowers emotions to cause blocks and missteps and impairs good decision-making. Instead of ignoring emotions, notice the signs – the knots in your stomach, a headache, a racing heartbeat, or an increase or decrease of sensation within your torso or limbs. Then ask yourself questions about what you are feeling. Name the emotion if you can. If not, google emotions to expand your vocabulary and your ability to name emotions. You may have heard the phrase with regard to emotions, “name them to tame them.” The power of emotions over thought processes and decision-making lessens with acknowledgement. Emotions are easier to spot than the hidden narratives and thoughts, but know that unconscious thinking also affects emotions.

What are you telling yourself about the difficult situation and conversation? Expand your self-awareness and expand your options for managing a difficult conversation effectively.

Why do you expect an upcoming difficult conversation to be difficult? What are you expecting to happen during the conversation? What emotions do you expect others to experience? What do you imagine they expect? 

After acknowledging your emotions and thoughts, consider the overall message and specific information you really want to convey and how best to do it, so that it will be heard and processed as you intend. Focus on your main message and a good outcome for the conversation so that collaboration for a solution becomes possible. Be clear about what you want, don’t want, need, expect, or prefer. Know your mind and then you’ll be better able to help others, who can’t read your mind, understand where you need help.  

Noticing isn’t just personal.  It’s about noticing the emotions of others and adjusting what you say and how you say it, to keep the conversation flowing productively. Emotions, just like the content of a conversation, provide important information.

2. Listen.

When your stress level is too high, you may overlook important information and limit the meaning of what you notice and hidden opportunities.  Instead, slow down. Take a breath. Do nothing other than listen carefully. Listen for content and emotion. What’s being said and how? It’s easy to assume that you understand another person’s position; however, conflict is often not about different positions as much as it is about emotions, interests, needs, and wants that go unnoticed and unacknowledged. The only way to understand another person is to listen to understand. Asking good, open-ended questions will give you content worth your time and effort to listen carefully.

It’s often easier to engage in targeted listening.  Listening for information that supports or undermines an existing position is easier than listening to understand what matters most to the person communicating an idea or emotion. Instead, if your goal is to resolve a conflict productively, listen without judgment.  Listen to understand. Assume whatever you hear is true for the person saying it instead of trying to correct what you believe is a misunderstanding. 

If you listen to better understand the other person’s interests and concerns, you may find options to resolve a conflict without damaging relationships.  One of my clients put it this way, “R before T.” Relationship before task.  The team and organization falls apart if relationships are not built and solidified at every opportunities. Without relationships, the tasks that can be completed are extremely limited.

3. Demonstrate that you care.

Even the best listener and the most astute observer and analyst conveys unintended messages by skipping over the opportunity to demonstrate understanding and compassion.   Digest what you hear and observe and share back your summary. Then, ask if you captured everything the other person wanted you to notice and understand. Include emotional tenor and not just content.

Active listening, empathic listening, or reflective listening all suggest the importance of being aware of the inadvertent messages you send by what you do and say during and after the other communicates. During any conversation, especially one with an element of conflict, the opportunity to convey intentional messages to improve relationships exists. If your goal is to strengthen the bonds of a business or personal relationship, take advantage of all such opportunities.

Demonstrate that you care about the other person by asking open-ended questions. Then, acknowledge their feelings, demonstrate concern, summarize and paraphrase what you hear, and then ask if you understood their meaning.

Comment

When change happens, don't run up the ladder of inference

Comment

When change happens, don't run up the ladder of inference

By Susan Letterman White

Hypothetical #1: Loren has been a partner at Smith, Green, and Post for close to 10 years. Loren is "a team player." Until one year ago, Loren was the "right hand" to named partner Chris Smith. Loren managed client relationships and was the first or second chair in most of the complex litigation that Chris claimed as origination. Loren never complained about the share of the firm profits, although the differential between the firm's highest and lowest paid partners had been widening over the years. Last year Loren was told to develop originations, experienced a pay cut and learned that Chris was giving work to other lawyers, junior to Loren. This year Loren was told that despite finding other sources of work to boost billable hours, Loren needed to leave the firm by the end of the year.

Hypothetical #2: Taylor hung a shingle after years of working in larger firms and as Taylor's firm grew, the time came to hire another lawyer. After much searching, Taylor hired Sydney about six years ago. It took Taylor and Sydney six months before true comfort in the working relationship developed. After five years, Taylor was certain in the belief that Sydney would become Taylor's partner. Their work styles were complimentary and they had become close friends. The past 24 months had seen a significant slow down in work and revenue. Indeed this topic was the first point of discussion for every office meeting. Additionally, Sydney had moved out of state and back home to be near family as Sydney's family grew larger with the birth of children. Sydney had expressed concern about the drop in revenue and the cost to the firm of keeping Sydney on payroll. When Sydney told Taylor of an intention to take a position with another law firm, Taylor was devastated.

Neither Loren nor Taylor wanted the changes they were experiencing to occur. Both were concerned about how to manage the change and still meet their interests, needs, wants, expectations, hopes, dreams, concerns and goals.

People often experience change as an unanticipated and undesirable loss and a "felt need" to change or escape from a particular uncomfortable situation. The simple fact is that we are loss-averse. As Nobel Prize-winning economist, Daniel Kahneman says, "the asymmetric intensity of the motives to avoid losses and to achieve gains shows up almost everywhere." When our thinking and behavior is driven by an intense desire to avoid feelings of loss instead of taking the time to adjust to those feelings and allow them to dissipate at the right time, we stop thinking effectively and instead jump to conclusions. This hinders our ability to move forward strategically and intentionally toward our true interests.

For example, Taylor may be in shock from the surprise that Sydney is leaving. Taylor may also feel a need for more revenue in the business. Instead of first making sense of Sydney's departure in a way that allows forward movement of actions, Taylor may not consider the possibility of maintaining any part of the relationship with Sydney. Instead Taylor may jump to the conclusion that the relationship is over, that there will be nobody with a complementary skill set and the business won't survive. Chris Argyris called this thinking, running up the ladder of inference.

In the previous example, Taylor may be only able to notice a small set of data relative to the departure of Sydney- that the relationship with Sydney is ended. Taylor selected a piece of data and attached a limited meaning - that the relationships with Sydney is over and without Sydney, the law firm couldn't be managed well or easily.

In the example with Loren, Loren's identity as a law firm lawyer may limit options for new positions outside of law firms. If Loren begins with a position that it is better to be a partner in a law firm than counsel in a corporation, Loren won't notice or consider any opportunities that might be a better fit with Loren's personality or interests.

When change happens to you, begin with an open mind and challenge your assumptions about the situation. Find your true interests and possible options.

Questions to ask: How did things change? What are my assumptions about the change(s)? Why? What if my assumption was wrong?

What are my interests, wants, needs, preferences, hopes and concerns? How can I move forward toward my interests? Where should I look for options?

Comment

Technology's Impact on Law Firm Management and Training

Comment

Technology's Impact on Law Firm Management and Training

By Susan Letterman White

Technology and the Disruption of Organizational Structures, Leadership & Management, and Talent Development & Evaluation

Technology will continue to change our workplace, as it has always done. It connects people with each other and new ideas that otherwise would remain separated by vast amounts of space and/or time, while paradoxically diminishing the quality and quantity of contact between people physically near to each other. Technology has eliminated opportunities while creating new ones. In short, technology has created options for new structures to change who can work together, new processes for how they can work together, and new product and service outcomes as a result of what they do.  Many of these changes present growth opportunities for different elements of the legal industry from law schools to law departments, law firms, and individual lawyers. 

Many leaders of professional service organizations look at technology as a disruptive threat to manage instead of an opportunity to leverage for a unique, competitive advantage. The fact that it is now possible to work together across vast expanses of space and time make mega-firms possible. The challenge is leading and managing those firms so that the organization, as an entity, is sustainable.

Indeed, this very challenge is present in much smaller firms, too. In the legal industry, repeated efforts to protect a marketplace position, flow from an argument to protect the public. The argument’s construct is that providing advice and drafting documents is a role reserved for the few people, who have received a certain level of education, experience, and expertise that is difficult to duplicate or automate.  This defensive position requires significant resources and has been limited in the past and additional limitations will arise in the future. The effort put into creating and enforcing laws to protect the public from the unauthorized practice of law could have gone elsewhere.

If the legal industry leaders had been looking for the opportunities associated with change as the Accounting profession moved from the European to the US marketplace, they might have been looking for way to eliminate prohibitions against lawyers and non-lawyers sharing work instead of foolishly trying to prevent the amplifying wave from hitting the shore. They were right to worry about the loss of work to Tax and Trusts & Estates attorneys; however, their response was mistaken and detrimental. Law schools could have developed courses, if not degrees, for aspiring accountants and the lawyers who would share work with them. 

Presently, law schools are missing the opportunity to create degree tracts in regulatory affairs , and law firms are missing the opportunity to provide a lower-cost service, despite the fact that Biotech, Pharmaceutical, and Medical Device industry leaders must have been complaining to their lawyers about the growth of an overwhelming amount of compliance paperwork. In the universities that see the opportunity, the tract is not housed in the law school. In another example, using the old argument that a lawyer, who is too closely connected to a non-lawyer in business can’t be trusted to maintain the independent judgment necessary to represent clients, the ABA has blocked alternate business structures that would allow the existence of publicly-held law firms, eliminate compensation policies that creates too much vulnerability to the organization with too much power in a few individuals, and provide funding to invest in more technology. Unfortunately, the lawyer mindset for change is to see risk and try to eliminate it, while the business mindset is to find the opportunity and leverage it. Finally, who isn’t familiar with Legal Zoom, which has productized many of the services, previously within a lawyer’s offerings and considered too creative for commodity packaging, and reduced the cost to consumers. 

Every one of the examples in the paragraph above begs organization leaders to consider their business model.  Combined with the next wave of changes, aimed at automating high-level management, leaders ought to feel the nudge to consider their talent management and development models, too. Developing and deepening relationships with clients and referral sources has become much more important as client loyalty (or dependency) has diminished. Leadership and management have risen in importance and the tasks and competencies defining both continue to change. Finally, it’s critical to consider the criteria by which talent – at the leadership and subordinate levels – is evaluated and consider options for change.  

The next stage of technology is aimed at automating high-level management and the law firms that remain competitive will consider adjustments to their organizational structure and what it means to be a lawyer, manager, and leader. Research, document drafting, marketing and business development, and invoicing and collecting fees are processes that have been transformed by technology. These transformations raised the importance of project management processes and skills.   

Enter iCEO, a virtual project manager for knowledge-based products. It’s only in Beta; however, in addition to being able to take a complex knowledge-based task and break it down into smaller individual tasks, it is also capable of assigning discrete tasks to knowledge-workers anywhere in the world by using multiple, already existing, software platforms. The latter platforms shake up the notion of a traditional workforce even more than do contract attorneys or moving functional divisions, like HR or finance to back offices located in cheaper real estate markets hundreds of miles from the front office spaces, which has been happening at least since 2001

Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, oDesk and Elance match requests for discrete tasks with workers, who will complete the tasks. Mechanical Turk is essentially a 24/7 virtual workforce.  The platform matches human intelligence workers with thousands of different tasks listed by requestors. When I reviewed the site for this article, one task was described as reviewing the work previously done to extract and verify information contained in a legal document. oDesk is a site for matching any job that can be done on a computer, from writing a blog to developing software, to the right individual, team, or technology tool. Elance lists categories of freelancers in several areas, including legal, marketing & sales, finance & management, office administration, and writing as well as web development. 

iCEO is managed by a person using a dashboard system to assign tasks , which allows the creation of drag and drop assembly lines for the production of a complex end product- for example, a 124-page research report for a Fortune 50 company.  IFTF, the non-profit that created the prototype software ran that experiment. Project management required a single skill, knowing how to use the iCEO software. The discrete tasks that went into the creation of the written report, including images and graphs, were routed across 23 people all over the world. The reduction in time from months to weeks and presumably cost were profound. It isn’t a huge leap from creating this type of research report to creating a legal memorandum on the current state of law on any issue. Law firms and legal departments are already creating proprietary databases with contract clauses from various types of contracts.  Perhaps vendors are too. Imagine the options.

Questions to ask and Ideas to Consider

Here’s the paradox: How can you design a sustainable and tightly-held-together organization and give individuals the independence they want and need?

Organizational Structures

Marina Gorbis, Executive Director of The Institute for the Future, suggests designing the organization to support individual initiative instead of managing to rigidly mold behavior and an expansive organizational network of relationships. Measure an individual’s performance by internal contributions to the business model and the person’s connections and standing in external communities that are important to the business model. Instead of organizing that is driven by a linear hierarchy, consider an organizational design driven by networks of projects and other relationship-drivers.

Structures, or how people are organized and connected and their actions influenced by others, include tangible structures, like office buildings and the arrangement of walls and intangible structures, like formal hierarchies, divisions, and teams, and the informal networks of friends and acquaintances. Places resembling offices, the corporate structure for the storage and flow of information, followed the invention of writing and the need to keep records and for people working on related projects to communicate, for example, banking in 14th Century Florence. The corporate organizational structure, created in the 18th century for the purpose of an efficient workplace, began changing in the 1960s with the advent creative professionals, who were paid to think. 

Management and Professional Development Processes

The project management function is obviously changing right now, even though most law firms barely have been introduced to current project management skills and best practices. So, too, should be attorney development, as is professional development in other industries. The argument that the legal, management, and professional development functions require too much creativity to allow for automation is being eroded and the erosion will continue. As people become more accustomed to receiving services coordinated with the assistance of technology, the benefits of reduced time and cost for technology driven management and professional development will grow. 

Law firms can choose to outsource to companies and individuals routine unskilled tasks like handling mail, reception, or photocopying duties or skilled tasks, like legal research and writing. Project management skills and training are the focus of professional development to leverage new technology opportunities and save time. Management, as a task and skill, has risen in importance and is about to fall in importance just as quickly. Traditional organization structures are becoming less and less important as a new generation of alternative technologies comes into existence.

Comment

The Curious Mindset

Comment

The Curious Mindset

By Susan Letterman White

Developing Curiosity for Better Communication

Curiosity is at the Foundation of Collaborative Communication

Curiosity is the ability to suspend judgment about what you see and hear in favor of gaining a more comprehensive understanding about meaning. In two way communication, we often jump to a conclusion about what we believe the meaning is behind a statement. In particular, people often state their positions instead of stating their interests - their goals, wants, needs, expectations, concerns, motivations, and hopes. People hearing positions then evaluate those positions through their lens of what is fair and reasonable. Options are eliminated before they are even identified because there is not opportunity to first identify interests, discover possible overlaps, and co-design solutions that meet the most important interests of each person.

Argyris and the Ladder of Inference: Instead of curiosity, people often run up the ladder of inference and restrict what they notice, how they make sense of what they notice, and ultimately, their choice in action. It starts when a person begins with a position in mind, which may limit the data the person notices.

The curious mindset begins with a suspension of judgment. Judgment and the allure of proving a position’s value is replaced with asking what information and assumptions are behind your position as well as the statement of others. You wonder and ask why something seems so important. Questions to show curiosity and suspend judgment are:

  1. Why is that important?

  2. Why is that a concern?

  3. Why does that matter?

  4. What leads you to that conclusion?

Comment

6 Tips on Productive Communication

Comment

6 Tips on Productive Communication

By Susan Letterman White

Communication Tips for Productive Conversation Introduction: 

Good communication along with relationship development and management are two interests that are at the foundation of productive meetings, retreats, and conversations, especially those in support of a change initiative. Communication between two people is a two-way process of perception, reflection and sense-making, creating an intention for a reply, and responding. People often start with very different perceptions of events. It’s no surprise that they reach different conclusion about meaning and appropriate responses. Communication Quality refers to the degree to which people understand the messages intended by each other. By listening and checking for understanding, in a back and forth fashion, the two people negotiate a shared understanding. Then, they are able to build on that foundation of shared understanding to identify options and design solutions. This valuable skill improves leadership efforts to drive change initiatives and the efforts of those who are trying with other to make sense of and adjust to changes in their environment.

Principles of Production Communication:

Productive communication solves problems and develops new ideas. It builds mutual understanding and develops relationships. There are six principles of productive communication to support mutual understanding and uncover options for strategic action. They are:

  1. Communicate purposefully

  2. Listen to understand

  3. Suspend judgment

  4. Identify interests

  5. Brainstorm options

  6. Design solutions

1.) Communicate purposefully means that you have a clear intention of how you want your communication to affect another person. Questions to ask yourself before you communicate include:

  • What is your purpose?

  • What are the messages you want to send?

  • To whom is each message directed?

  • How can you best convey your message?

2.) Listen to understand means that you listen to another person without planning your response. After carefully listening to understand the person’s interests, you ask questions to check whether or not your perception of the communication is what the person intended to communicate to you. Statements to seek understanding are open ended questions or requests for elaboration and begin with:

  • Let me see if I understand, you said…

  • Did you mean…

  • Tell me more about…

3.) Suspend judgment means that you are curious to discover what information and assumptions are behind a person’s statements. You refrain from stating your position and arguing and instead you state your interests. You wonder why something communicated is important to the person communicating. Questions to show curiosity and suspend judgment are:

  • Why is that important?

  • Why is that a concern?

  • Why does that matter?

  • What leads you to that conclusion?

4.) Identify interests means identifying goals, wants, needs, expectations, concerns, and hopes.

  • Disclose your interests.

  • Listen for and acknowledge the interests of others.

  • Clarify your understanding of others’ interests.

  • Look for and identify shared interests.

5.) After everyone has had an opportunity to identify their interests and understands the interests of others, the group can brainstorm options to satisfy as many interests as possible. It is not the time to evaluate the options. It is the time to generate as many options as possible. Look for and identify shared options.

6.) Designing solutions means jointly discussing the options and how each satisfies interests. It is the time for evaluating solutions. Look for fairness, reasonableness, and the ability to implement the solutions. Do you need to add in time management or accountability processes for ideal solution implementation?

Comment

The Power of the Pause

Comment

The Power of the Pause

by Ashley Coleman-Fitch

Take one minute right now to pause– to do nothing for even just ten seconds. 

What did you do with your pause? 

How did it feel? 

How do you feel now on the other side of that pause? 

I recently facilitated a group working to build a more inclusive culture within their organization. As this group of primarily outspoken leaders contemplated how to bring the more reserved members of their teams into important conversations, the topic of silence came up. “We all need to pause,” one participant said, “[but] when I pause, I hear nothing. The silence is killer– not hearing that engagement on the other end.” There were murmurings of agreement. It seemed that the group understood all too well the risks of a lull in the conversation and accordingly, like many of us, had become practiced at avoiding these lulls by filling the space. But what happens, I challenged them, when we allow that silence and embrace it? 

As we discovered through our discussion, four powerful things happen: 

  1. We allow ourselves space to think and respond mindfully

  2. We create space for others to enter the conversation

  3. We listen to the quality of the silence 

  4. We breathe… and so does the conversation

Responding Mindfully 

The essence of mindfulness is the practice of pausing to acknowledge the present moment and allowing our whole selves– our physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual selves– to show up in a space. When we are more attuned to the world around us, we begin fostering cultures of inclusion in diverse settings. Some experts argue that cultivating mindfulness is the most important step in developing intercultural competence, the individual precursor to developing cultures of inclusion.  Cultural competence expert Stella Ting-Toomey suggests that we must not only pay attention to ourselves– to our assumptions, to our internal dialogue, and to our emotional reactions– but also to others, “becoming exquisitely attuned to the other's communication assumptions, cognitions, and emotions.” (1) We begin to see more, to listen better, and to take in each interaction with the whole of ourselves, approaching the unfamiliar with curiosity and compassion rather than judgment and intractability. “To be mindful of intercultural conflict differences, we have to leam to see the unfamiliar behavior from multiple cultural angles.” 

The Buddist monk, spiritual leader, and peace activist  Thich Nhat Hanh writes, “Whenever we feel carried away, sunk into a deep emotion, or caught in thoughts about the past or future, we can return to our breathing to collect and anchor our mind.” (2) Nhat Hanh invites us to pause, to breathe, and to gather ourselves before moving forward– to become present and take ownership over our response. In this way, we give ourselves time to digest the present moment– what happened, as well as our emotional response– before responding, resulting in fewer gaffes and missteps in the conversation. Additionally, this practice allows each of us a moment to check our implicit biases and blind spots, consider the perspective we are speaking from, and purposefully attune our response to our particular audience to ensure that all aspects of our message– verbal and non-verbal– are heard and received by our intended audience, thereby also decreasing the likelihood that we might unintentionally offend someone we are attempting to connect with. Maybe it sounds like a lot of work, but it’s the work we need to do to connect better and be more whole and human, which feel like worthy goals. 

In addition to encouraging your full, authentic self to be present and helping you check your assumptions, biases, and blind spots before putting your foot in it, pausing to become more mindful does one other thing almost by accident: It makes you a more powerful, eloquent orator.

 As a facilitator, my role is to guide the conversation– to highlight pivotal ideas and help my participants get past blockages to dive deep into the subject. It can be tempting to talk, but after years of facilitating, I know that mine is the least important voice in the conversation. Truth and solutions are most powerful when people discover them themselves, so my goal is to talk as little as possible, keeping the spotlight on the most important people in the room– the people doing the work. It took me time to appreciate the value of saying less and even more time to learn to use silence as emphasis, highlighting the key part of my message. Embracing silence made me choose my words more intentionally, making my message more powerful and resonating in the silence that followed. It took me even more time to skillfully leverage silence to encourage my participants to become fully engaged and invested, allowing me to step back into the role of coach and guide. That is the power of the pause– its stillness acts as a catalyst for creativity and an invitation towards action and engagement. It invites flow– authentic energy exchange.  

An Invitation to Enter

“I grew up in a big family. If I didn’t talk over people, I’d never be heard.” one participant commented. There was lots of nodding and noises of assent around the table. 

Someone else offered, “I grew up in a family where it was not ok to interrupt someone who was speaking. It was deeply ingrained in me:  Wait your turn to speak… or else,” she finished laughing. 

The dichotomy of these two statements illustrates several important things for leaders to remember as they work to facilitate inclusive discussions: The deeply ingrained patterns that may never be articulated but show up in every exchange we engage in, the differences in communication styles, and, as a leader and facilitator, the necessity of attending to all of these different styles and carving out space for each of them in the space.  

Just as people enter a space differently– some strike up a conversation before they’ve even entered a room while others take a lap, mapping out the lay of the land before settling in while still others need to nest first– people enter conversations differently as well. Some dive right in, always the first to speak; others wait to be invited. As a leader and facilitator, it is important to be mindful of these different styles and leverage silence as a tool to level the playing field. 

A purposeful pause is an invitation. It allows your audience– learners, attendees, participants, peers, etcetera– space in the discussion to breathe, to digest your message, and to formulate their own mindful response. People are allowed to respond to what you have said silently, reflecting on both your message and their reaction before feeling pressured to respond back. 

Listening to the Silence

Have you ever gone out in the middle of a snowstorm and listened to the snow fall? There is nothing more emblematic of a peaceful moment than listening to the whisper of those tiny flakes shushing themselves into tiny piles. The world is muted, and for a moment, it’s easy to get lost in the stillness and the magic of the moment. 

But why is that moment so magical? What is it about snow that transports us and invites us to simultaneously get lost and be present? Its visual qualities aside– striking as they may be– part of snow’s magic is its ability to mute the world– to impose silence and stillness on a world that is constantly moving. And in that silence we find peace. 

Most of us are aware, at least peripherally, that every silence has its own quality: some silences are pregnant, full of anxiety and anticipation; others are tense, holding all of the unnamed feelings in the space; others feel dead, devoid of life or engagement; while still others can signal contentment and mutual understanding, a freeing from the usual din of small talk to be replaced by amiable presence with another. 

As facilitators, we are often so afraid of those uncomfortable silences, or worse yet, those dead silences that likely indicate that we have lost our audience, so instead, we fill the silences with our own noise. In doing so, we miss one of the richest sources of information that could tell us not only how our message is being received but who is receiving it and how. When we actually pause to listen to the silence, it speaks volumes. Armed with this new information, we can then better adapt our next steps to respond more effectively and guide the group toward the desired goal.   

Breathe

A pause in a conversation is like the blank space between paintings in a museum or gallery– it gives the mind space to rest, digest, and reflect before moving on to the next. It invites each of us– and the conversation– to breathe, to take in all of the nuance and complication embedded in our messaging, and to respond thoughtfully, as our whole authentic selves. 

Pausing to breathe, to contemplate, to respond makes us more effective communicators. It makes our message more powerful and leaves room for us to become more generous and compassionate listeners. This might be the most important skill in both understanding others and making them feel heard and valued, thus fostering community development based on authentic inclusion and belonging. 

Viktor Frankl once said, “Between stimulus and response there is a space…In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response, lies our growth and our freedom.” Create space to nurture your growth. Pause. 



Comment

How to Respond to Microaggressions

Comment

How to Respond to Microaggressions

By Susan Letterman White

Microaggressions are commonplace daily verbal or behavioral slights that are often unintentional, yet communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward culturally marginalized groups. As leaders, it is important to act in ways that contribute to a culture of inclusion. That means considering what you will do when you are either the recipient of a microaggression or the observer of a microaggression directed at another person.

Whether to act or stay silent depends on many factors and the decision of whether to act, and if, what to say or do, is an example of a difficult leadership decision.  Factors to consider include what the actual recipient of a microaggression wants, the good of the entire group or organization in which the event happened, the timing and surrounding circumstances of the event, and if action is the conclusion should it be done publicly or privately.  

Additionally, you should consider whether acting will escalate a situation in an unhelpful or dangerous way.  Is there a risk of danger to physical safety? Will the utterer become excessively defensive in a manner that is better handled privately or not alone? If the relationship is important to you, how will what you say affect the relationship? 

Some scholars have criticized the microaggression concept thinking it promotes psychological fragility and possibly stalls the development of skills to stand up for oneself. Certainly, the developmental trajectory of the individual recipient is important, as is what the individual wants to happen. Regardless, there is no excuse for leaders who do not recognize the harm microaggressions can cause and consider what they will do when it happens.

It takes courageous leadership to manage one’s emotions and also the behaviors of others in conflict situations. When a person uses a microaggression, regardless of whether it is aimed at a particular person or just offered as a poor joke, that action sets up a conflict, because, at the very least, it should not be an acceptable behavior in an inclusive workplace. 

The conditions that contribute to or subtract from leadership courage are rarely discussed. There are four conditions that all leaders should cultivate.

First, they should have a mental health, self-care routine.  When we feel emotionally well, we are better able to think constructively, call on a reserve of energy, and have difficult conversations. 

Second, leaders should be able to reframe a difficult situation as a challenge and ask: How might I address this challenge? Related to this concept is the third condition. Leaders should conduct a cost-benefit analysis that highlights the benefit of being courageous, which often means not falling back on default ways of thinking, feeling, and acting and instead practicing new and different approaches. For example, if speaking up seems like the right decision, but also difficult, highlight the benefits of acting and the risks of doing nothing. For example, you might say, “Do I want to stay silent and feel bruised and belittled or do I want to speak up and feel my self-worth and power as a leader here?”

Finally, leaders should remind themselves of a commitment to developing a growth mindset and putting that to use.  If the behavior seems challenging and difficult, it ought to signal a growth opportunity for learning or honing a valuable skill. Lean in and grow as a leader. Growth is often better as a team sport. If you are able, form a leadership support group where you can share stories of trying, learning, and growing and introduce a cultural norm where leaders prize the attempts of their colleagues and direct reports who share such stories.

Courageous leaders may be ready to say or do something in response to a microaggression and still not know what to say or do.  If it happens to you, it’s your choice whether to act or not. If you observe an event, it may be your responsibility to act or act in a particular way to comply with organization rules.  

If you decide to act, use feedback approaches that have the highest likelihood of being beneficial.  A skillful feedback response is delivered as close as possible in time to the event, criticizes the behavior rather than the person, uses “I” statements, and is clear about the behavior that must change.  For example, you might say, “When you said X, I felt Y.  In the future, I would prefer if you did not say/do X.  I understand that you may not have intended me to feel this way. Perhaps you were making a joke or you think I’m overreacting. However, our working relationship is important enough for me to speak up. I hope you understand. 

Comment